Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3193 14
Original file (NR3193 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
___#
AB

     

a DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY _

 

=

    
   

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVALRECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE KOA, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA. 22204-2490

 

EGA
Docket No: 3193-14
o Tarmac MATE

ed KY

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 January 2015. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request..

Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and
policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 27 March 2007 and served without
disciplinary incident. On 6 August 2008 you were diagnosed with
a borderline personality disorder. Shortly thereafter, on 15
September 2008, you were recommended for an administrative
separation by reason of convenience of the government due to the
diagnosed personality disorder. Subsequently, on 17 September
2008, while serving in pay grade E-4, you were administratively
discharged with an honorable characterization of service. At
that time you were assigned a separation code of JFK, a reentry
code of RE-4, and your narrative reason for separation was
personality disorder. In this regard, you were assigned the

most appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your reenlistment code and the Naval
Discharge Review Board's decision to change your narrative
reason for separation to. Secretarial Authority. Nevertheless,
the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant
relief in your case because you were not recommended for
reenlistment. Finally, Sailcrs discharged by reason of
personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code, which is a bar to reenlistment... Again, you
were assigned the most appropriate reenlistment code for your
éituation. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is:on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or aT UStiLee..

Sincerely,

 

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11326-07

    Original file (11326-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 11326-07 14 November 2008 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06555-07

    Original file (06555-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 September 2002 at age 20. You served over two years without incident...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08006-07

    Original file (08006-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It also considered the medical record submitted in support of your case which states, in part, that presently there is no evidence of a personality disorder, and that the resolution of the diagnosed symptoms were likely due to your situational changes. Nevertheless, the Board concluded...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00911-08

    Original file (00911-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changes to your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your diagnosed personality disorder and nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07967-07

    Original file (07967-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time you were again recommended for an administrative separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00

    Original file (08322-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08679-07

    Original file (08679-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or changes to your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your diagnosed personality disorder, period of UA, and since your conduct average was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13006-09

    Original file (13006-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00301-10

    Original file (00301-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03523-08

    Original file (03523-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code for your situation.